Legal Tools
Sign in

User Guide · Korrespond

How to use Korrespond.

A step-by-step walkthrough of every control — from choosing your mode to understanding the output and using the formal citation refine pass.

In this guide

  1. Choose a mode: Reply or Initiate
  2. Choose the recipient body
  3. Output type
  4. Tone
  5. Context fields
  6. Describe the situation & goal chips
  7. Upload files (Reply mode)
  8. The clarify gate
  9. Understanding the output
  10. Using the Refine pass
  11. Tips & gotchas
1

Choose a mode: Reply or Initiate

Mode toggle showing Reply and Initiate options

Reply mode is for when you have received a letter, decision, or notice and need to respond to it. Upload the document (PDF, DOCX, or TXT) and the tool will read it as the basis for your reply. You can still add narrative context.

Initiate mode is for when you want to start a new correspondence from scratch — no incoming document. You'll describe the situation in the "What happened" field. This mode is required for the narrative field.

2

Choose the recipient body

The recipient body dropdown pre-loads the relevant statute set into the Hard-RAG retrieval pipeline. Choosing correctly means the tool searches the right laws — you don't need to know which statutes apply yourself.

Recipient Statutes loaded Typical use
Barnehagebarnehageloven · fvlEnrolment disputes, special needs provisions
Skole (1.–10. trinn)opplæringslova · fvlAccess to education, psycho-social environment
SFOopplæringslova · fvlAfter-school care disputes
NAVNAV-loven · fvlBenefit denials, appeal of decisions
Bufdirfvl · EMK Art. 8Adoption, surrogacy, family reunification
Barnevernetbarnevernsloven · fvl · EMK Art. 8Care orders, emergency placements, tiltaksplan
Statsforvalterenfvl · barnevernslovenComplaints about municipality / Barnevernet
Trygderettentrygderettsloven · fvlSocial security tribunal appeals
Tingrettentvisteloven · EMK Art. 6Court filings, procedural motions
Kommune (annet)fvlAny other municipal body
Annetfvl (general)Authorities not in the list above
3

Output type

Choose the format that fits what you need to send.

TypeWhen to use itStructure
EmailDay-to-day correspondence, quick inquiries, follow-upsShort subject + body with signature
Formal letterOfficial complaints, appeals, access-to-documents requestsSender/receiver block, date, reference, body, signature
Court/tribunal filingSubmissions to Tingretten or TrygderettenNumbered sections, legal argument structure, prayer for relief
Phone-call prepBefore calling a caseworker or authorityOpening line · key facts · statutes to cite if pressed · questions to ask · escalation path
4

Tone

Tone affects the register and directness of the draft — not the legal accuracy. The AI will maintain correct Norwegian procedural formality regardless of tone.

ToneWhen to use it
CooperativeFirst contact, relationship still intact, no conflict yet
Neutral-professional ★Default. Works for most situations — factual, polite, direct
FirmDeadline has passed, previous requests ignored, clear legal obligation exists
AdversarialFormal complaints, escalations, when cooperation has broken down completely. Use intentionally — sets a confrontational tone that can close doors.
Conciliatory-warmDe-escalation, apology situations, requesting a second chance or meeting
5

Context fields

Case reference (saksnummer): The reference number on any letter you've received. Providing this helps the AI draft precise references in the header. If you don't have one yet, leave it blank.

Where (kommune / fylke): The geographical location of the authority. This helps the AI address the letter correctly and can affect which specific regulations apply (e.g. local school rules).

Next deadline: If there's a deadline for your response or action, enter it here. The AI will include an explicit deadline reference in the letter where appropriate. Accepts YYYY-MM-DD or plain text like "3 weeks from today".

Who is involved: Names and roles of the key parties — you, any caseworker, the child if relevant, a lawyer, etc. Keep it brief (e.g. "Me (parent), caseworker Anna Hansen, son Ola (age 8)"). Tip: use the Redact tool first if you'll share this externally.

6

Describe the situation & choose a goal

Narrative field and goal chips

"What happened / context" is the most important field. Write what happened, when, who decided what, and what outcome you want. The more specific you are, the better the draft. 8,000 characters maximum.

Goal chips let you quickly state your legal goal. Click one to auto-fill the Goal field — you can then edit it. Each chip maps to a specific procedural right:

  • Access to docs (fvl §18) — Request access to all documents in your case
  • Appeal (fvl §28) — Formally appeal a decision to the klageinstans
  • Request meeting — Request a face-to-face meeting with a caseworker
  • Reasoned decision (fvl §24-25) — Demand a written, reasoned decision
  • Right to be heard (fvl §17) — Invoke your procedural right to be heard before a decision
  • Complaint — File a complaint about caseworker conduct
  • Clarify timeline — Ask for a status update and expected timeline

You can type your own goal in the text field instead of — or in addition to — using a chip.

7

Upload files (Reply mode)

In Reply mode, upload the letter or decision you received. The AI will read and summarise it as the basis for your reply. Supported formats: PDF, DOCX, TXT. Up to 4 files, max 8 MB each.

Convention: the first file uploaded is treated as the primary received letter. Additional files are treated as supporting attachments (e.g. previous correspondence, evidence).

In Initiate mode, uploads are optional — use them to provide supporting context (previous letters, medical reports, etc.).

All files are processed in memory and immediately discarded when the session ends. Nothing is written to disk or retained.

8

The clarify gate

Before drafting, the AI runs a quick classification pass (Pass 1) to understand your situation. If it finds gaps that would significantly affect the quality of the draft — a missing decision date, unclear which child is involved, unknown authority — it pauses and shows a "Before we draft, clarify:" panel with specific questions.

Answer what you can, then click Continue draft. Your answers are merged into the context before Pass 2 runs. This extra step costs no additional credit.

If you're in a hurry or simply don't know the answers, click Draft anyway. The tool will proceed with what it has and flag uncertainties in the output.

Note: the clarify pass is free. Credits are only deducted when the actual drafting (Pass 2) begins.

9

Understanding the output

Two-column output: Norwegian bokmål and English side by side

The output has two columns:

  • Norsk (bokmål) — canonical: The legally operative draft. This is what you send. Use the Copy or Download .txt button to get the text.
  • Working language — reference: A translation into your working language (EN/PL/UK). Use this to understand what you're sending — do not send this version to the authority.

Cited law note: at the bottom of the output, a note shows how many law sources were retrieved and cited. If it says "No cited law sources — draft is plain-language", it means no statute matched your situation closely enough to cite — the draft will still be useful but won't include § references. This is the honest behaviour: no fake citations.

10

Using the Refine pass

Refine panel with Norwegian law, ECHR, and Both options

The Refine with formal citations panel appears after the initial draft. This optional second pass (+1 credit) rewrites the draft with court-ready citation style and appends a Rettskilder (legal sources) block at the end.

Choose your jurisdiction scope:

  • Norwegian law only: Rewrites to use jf. forvaltningsloven § 17, jf. opplæringslova § 9 A-4 style. Best for most domestic correspondence.
  • ECHR (EMK + HUDOC): Adds European Court of Human Rights citations with full case name, application number, date, and paragraph — e.g. Strand Lobben m.fl. mot Norge, EMD-37283/13 (17.09.2019), § 207. Use when arguing family life rights (Art. 8) or fair trial (Art. 6).
  • Both: Combines Norwegian statute citations with ECHR case law. Strongest for Barnevernet, Bufdir, or court filings where both domestic and ECHR grounds apply.
Refined output with formal citations including opplæringslova and EMK
11

Tips & gotchas

Use the Redact tool first. If your narrative includes full names, fødselsnumre, or addresses, run it through Redact before pasting into Korrespond — especially if you plan to share the output.
Saksnummer helps a lot. Even a partial case reference from a letter header helps the AI address the reply correctly and cite the right case context.
Adversarial tone is powerful — use it intentionally. It signals formal conflict escalation. Once sent, it can close cooperative doors. Use Firm first unless you've genuinely exhausted other options.
Goal chips stack with the narrative. If you pick "Appeal (fvl §28)" but your narrative also mentions access to documents, the AI will address both — you don't need to pick just one chip.
Deadline field affects the draft directly. The AI explicitly states the deadline in the letter and frames the request with urgency where appropriate. Always fill it in if one exists.
For ECHR citations, choose Barnevernet or Bufdir as body. Those presets load the ECHR + family law corpus slices. The Refine pass will then find the strongest relevant case law (Strand Lobben, Johansen, K.O. and V.M.).

Ready to try it?

Free for Do Better Norge members.

Sign in to use Korrespond → Register free How it works under the hood